Kulbhushan Jadhav Death Sentence : India Calls It ‘Premeditated Murder’ - The India Saga

Logo

Logo

Kulbhushan Jadhav Death Sentence : India Calls It ‘Premeditated Murder’

Pakistan’s Army General, Qamar Javed Bajwa, has confirmed the death sentence awarded to alleged Indian ‘spy’, Kulbhushan Jadhav. This speedy…

Kulbhushan Jadhav Death Sentence : India Calls It ‘Premeditated Murder’

PakistanÂs Army General, Qamar Javed Bajwa, has confirmed the death sentence awarded to alleged Indian ÂspyÂ, Kulbhushan Jadhav. This speedy decision was officially declared via a press statement by the Inter Services Public Relation (ISPR), which is the publicity wing of PakistanÂs military force.
Kulbhushan Jadhav, the former Indian Navy officer, was arrested in the restive province of Balochistan on March 3, 2016. He was accused of being involved with the Balochistan separatists (and their activities) as an agent of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). He was later detained in Pakistan under charges of Âespionage and sabotageÂ, which proved to be the prelude to his death sentence.
 In 2016, the Pakistani army had released a Âvideo confession of Kulbhushan Jadhav. In the video, Jadhav allegedly said that he arrived in Iran in 2003 and had started a small business in Chahbahar. However, India questioned the authenticity of the video and rejected it.India Calls It ÂPremeditated MurderÂ
The Indian government has repeatedly rejected the charges on Jadhav and has also questioned his arrest. In the wake of this death sentence, India summoned the Pakistani High Commissioner in New Delhi, Abdul Basit, and issued a demarche, condemning the act as ÂfarcicalÂ. The demarche also stated: ÂIf this sentence against an Indian citizen, awarded without observing basic norms of law and justice, is carried out, the government and people of India will regard it as a case of premeditated murder.Â
India has always maintained that Jadhav was kidnapped from Iran and had no link with Balochistan separatists (which Pakistan accused Jadhav of). Islamabad also repeatedly rejected IndiaÂs request to have access to Jadhav, who had allegedly possessed an Iranian residency permit and a passport in the name of Hussain Mubarak Patel. Apparently, the address given in the passport was that of Sangli, Maharashtra.
Some senior Pakistani journalists and leaders have also come to know that the Indian national was allegedly framed by the Pakistani army. They are also of the opinion that he hasnÂt been given sufficient chances to defend himself.
The human rights watchdog Amnesty International has also condemned the death sentence given to Jadhav. It has stated: ÂUnder PakistanÂs military courts, no information about the charges or evidence against suspects is made public.Â
On the other hand, PakistanÂs defence minister, Khawaja Asif, has said that the death sentence should serve as a Âwarning to those Âplotting against Pakistan.
PakistanÂs Hurry Is Suspicious
In 2013, Indian national Sarabjit Singh, who was also sentenced to death for similar charges, was killed inside LahoreÂs Lakhpat Jail in a cold-blooded attack by jail inmates.
Six months after IndiaÂs Âsurgical strikeÂ, Pakistan again proved that no number of diplomatic talks can release the tension between the two countries. In the current scenario, bilateral talks between India and Pakistan seem to be a dream rather than a reality.
Pakistan has been continuously accusing India for fuelling violence in Balochistan without evidence. Moreover, despite the fact that India had submitted dossiers on the Pathankot and Uri attacks, which apparently contained sufficient evidence of Pakistani involvement in the attacks, Pakistan was unmoved and remained inactive for months.
Now this impulsive action by PakistanÂs army court may well worsen the diplomatic relations between the two nations.
Options before Kulbhushan Jadhav
According to the existing laws in Pakistan, the military court convicts are not eligible to appeal in the civilian court. But there are two options available to Jadhav. (Source- Indiatoday.in)
– Pakistan Army Act 1952 gives right to a convict to appeal in the Military Appellate Tribunal. – The second option is to appeal for a Âreview in the FGCM court. 

Advertisement